Afternoon Wheeler news

Wheeler
So what are you doing while waiting to hear what an arbiter thinks Blake Wheeler is worth?
Do you have candles lit, are you twiddling your thumbs, or maybe you’re debating trading in your Wheeler sweater for one that says Horton or Seguin?
Well, anyway, Andy Strickland of Hockeybuzz.com is hearing that Wheeler is going to get between $2.1 and 2.4 million — a fair compromise for both sides. Strickland also writes that the Bruins are unlikely to walk away from any award in that range, and I definitely agree. For an offense-challenged team like the Bruins to let a young, maturing would-be 25-goal-scorer walk after they worked hard to acquire him and develop him would be nuts. If trading him turns out to be the best move, so be it. But there are better ways to clear cap space than letting Wheeler walk. And how embarrassing would it be if Wheeler went somewhere they preach offense and he popped in 30 goals? There’s no reason to risk that happening without compensation.
And while we’re on the topic, Joe Haggerty of CSNNE.com says his sources expect a ruling to come Thursday, not today. That’s not surprising. Most often, arbiter’s like to take their time with such matters.
Sorry for the misinformation
If the Bruins agree to the arbitrator’s decision, then they can trade Wheeler (I doubt there’s a NTC in there).
Kessel wasn’t a sign-and-trade. He signed that huge deal with the Leafs after the Bruins traded his rights to Toronto.
David – I am searching my memory banks here, but I think that Kessels deal came without an arbitration. I do not believe he was eligible for arbitration last year, and the trade was determined by the RFA guidelines for compensations and picks to the team with the rights to the player.
The only exception, I believe, is that Burke sweetened the pot a little bit with an extra 3rd rounder. Again, its a little hazy… Matt will probably chime in and put me in my place.
Phil Kessel was signed and traded last season as an RFA. Memory doesn’t serve if it was after arbitration or not, but it was late in the summer, so my guess would be that it was an arbitrated hearing.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Kalman, BostonSports93. BostonSports93 said: RT @TheBruinsBlog: New blog: Afternoon Wheeler news http://www.thebruinsblog.net/2010/07/28/afternoon-wheeler-news/ #bruins [...]
Matt…if we accept the arbiter’s ruling then I thought we couldn’t trade Wheeler for a year? Or am I confused on that?