
Sturm/By S. Bradley
WILMINGTON, Mass. — After his Bruins teammates practiced on the ice and he worked out behind the scenes, winger Marco Sturm addressed the media about his situation one day after several media reports had him traded to Los Angeles.He professed his love for the Bruins and even expressed a willingness to stay, even though general manager Peter Chiarelli requested he waive his no-trade clause and presented potential destinations to the veteran. Why would someone who loves Boston and the team, and signed a contract with the club that includes an NTC, agree to be traded?
“I’ve got to see the situation. I had a talk with Peter and he explained it to me,” said Sturm. “There’s a lot of things involved. Obviously I can’t tell. But I’ve got to look for my future too, and that’s why.”
You don’t need an English-German dictionary to read between the lines and understand what Sturm’s talking about. While Sturm would be bailing the Bruins out, the threat of being waived and then demoted to the Providence (AHL) farm club is obviously on the table because of salary-cap considerations. The Bruins obviously don’t have him in their plans right now and see moving Sturm as the best way to avoid a cap crunch. Sturm is on Long Term Injured Reserve right now. His salary doesn’t count against their cap. However, Boston would have to move money off the salary cap to make room for his $3.5 million cap hit. If he goes to Providence, the Bruins pay him but do not get the cap hit.
In years past, numerous players with the Toronto Maple Leafs, and famously Dany Heatley in Ottawa, have held their team hostage over their NTC — as is their right after signing a binding contract. Sturm revealed today that after Chiarelli made his request, he slept on it and agreed the next day.
Obviously, Sturm doesn’t want to play in the AHL some 13 years after reaching the NHL without ever playing down on the farm.However, there are certain teams he’s willing to join. One would suspect the Kings are on his approved list, considering his past relationship with LA general manager Dean Lombardi dating back to their time in San Jose. Without acknowledging that there was a deal in place with the Kings, Sturm said he didn’t know why he wasn’t traded Thursday and said he did not take a physical. It was speculated he might’ve failed a physical because of his two surgically repaired knee, including the one he is still rehabilitating from.
For now, Sturm remains property of the Bruins. According to a team representative, Sturm’s day off the ice was already scheduled. Head coach Claude Julien said he expects Sturm to skate with the team Saturday morning in Toronto. And the timeline for Sturm to play in a game is still targeting mid-December.
“The teams he told me, they’re good teams,” said Sturm. “So I think a few of them I think would be a good fit. But it’s [Peter's] choice now.”









I agree with your point of using the assets built up to acquire a good defenseman for the stretch. They could include almost anyone of their prospects and or draft picks.
I’ve focused on Yandle because he is talented, young and improving. Realistically, the Coyotes aren’t likely to trade him now. They have a good team and are certainly looking at a playoff spot themselves. So, anyother good young defensemen the Bruins should be looking at?
Oh, ok, makes sense. Peca on TSN was saying they still had both, but I didn’t think we could have raped them that bad haha… Still, we have more than enough picks to dish one need be. I love Yandle as well. A top 4 of Chara, Boychuck, Seidenberg & Yandle sounds lovely.
CNL: The Bruins don’t have the Maple Leaf’s second round pick this draft, just the first round. They do have two first (the Leafs and their own) and two second rounds (the additional pick was acquired from Phoenix for Derek Morris).
I like the idea of trading for Keith Yandle. He is a RFA at the end of season but with Ryder and Sturm coming off the books he should be re-signable.
After last season, I can’t see us not doing what it takes to get that D-Man for the playoff push, even if we do overpay a bit for it or end up with a rental.
Keep in mind, in this draft we have a Leafs first and second rounder, as well as both of our own (I think we may even have another 2nd rounder?). We can certainly part with one of those and package it to obtain what we need. Deadline day hasn’t seen anything but second round picks move, the past couple of seasons. We’re looking good right now. We don’t even talk about the riches down in Providence during these debates.
Tru – that’s what I was thinking, yep.
Assuming the Sturm situation sorts itself out, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Wheeler and a pick moved for a second pairing type PMD around the deadline. Guys that come to mind are Niskanen or Daley in Dallas, Stalman in Cbus, White in Carolina, Burns in Minnesota, Wisniewski in NYI, Campoli from Ottawa, Bieksa or Ehrhoff in Van
I’m hoping for a second line defenseman who is looking for a change of scenery. somebody in the 2.5 to 3 million dollars per year range. I’m no expert on who may be available, but the Bruins can offer numbers/volume. and I mean Ryder, Paille and Sturm. if not more. it is said too often in sports, but this team is so close to championship-caliber. they are going to need another defenseman soon. make the moves, earn the reward. no risk, no glory.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Kalman, BostonSports93. BostonSports93 said: RT @TheBruinsBlog: New blog: Sturm on waiving NTC: ‘I’ve got to look for my future too’ http://t.co/dc3ZFKO [...]
Don’t hold your breath on the Bruins trading for a top-4 defender this season. Its just not going to happen. The only way they could swing such a deal would be to overpay – as in giving up so much that you leave your NHL roster barren (think of how NJ has had to call up a bunch of kids to fill the holes around Kovy because of the cap) OR you part with a piece of your team that nobody would want to part with (i.e., Krejci). No team is going to give up such a sought after commodity unless the returns were immense or the D-man’s expensive contract was expiring (i.e. Kaberle). In any case, I don’t think it would be in the Bruins interest to pull the trigger on said deal. Wait until the offseason when you have more cap & roster flexibility to try a swing a trade or FA signing.
Furthermore, don’t count on any potential trades involving Michael Ryder, Danny Paille (or Marco Sturm) returning much in terms of NHL talent. You’re honestly looking at draft picks and MAYBE a player of equal talent who needs a change of scenery.
so, would you like this?
Lucic-Krejci-Ryder
Recchi-Bergeron-Wheeler
Seguin-Savard-Horton
Marchand-Campbell-Thornton
Tru – was thinking last night swapping Ryder and Horton might be a good idea. Ryder is showing some touch and has played well with Krejci before. Horton needs a kick in the a$$, he’s playing like trash right now, a 1 pt in 7 game slump is ok if you contribute elsewhere but he’s been invisible.
duh… I forgot Caron! bonus!
very interesting. thanks.
also, I’d like to share a post I made elsewhere in response to somebody challenging my criticisms of Ryder, as it addresses what is left to be done with the process of making this team one that can hoist metal.
—
Mikey Ryder is the only Boston Bruin worse than minus-1 for this season (insert Tru’s favorite link here). yes, he scores, but when he doesn’t have the puck, he is a bag full of uselessness. a fast-skating goal-scorer shouldn’t be a minus if the rest of his team is plus, so either put him on a top line or get him out of here. pairing him with a rookie (no disdain) who has yet to figure the NHL style of hockey out and rotating in and out a cast of rehabbing/new-position-testing/call-up-of-the-week players for the third forward on that line is not going to turn him into a benefit for the team. he’s on the way out.
how about this?
Lucic-Krejci-Horton
Recchi-Bergeron-Ryder
Seguin-Savard-Thornton
Marchand-Campbell-Wheeler
Chara-Ference
Stuart-Seidenberg
Boychuk-McQuaid
Thomas
(Paille, Arniel, Rask)
each line has grit and if a team gets too physical with any one line (like, say, Bergeron’s) send Marchand/Campbell/Wheeler//Boychuk/McQuaid out against them. eventually Seguin/Savard would probably switch with Recchi/Bergeron. Boychuk and Stuart could be switched back, but are as above with the assumption that Stuart would be replaced with a better defensman (a proper second-liner), through trading Paille, Arniel, Sturm and almost anybody from the Providence roster. they could even give up five players (adding either two from Providence or, assuming the other team wants to dump an ill-fitting forward back, one and Ryder) to capitalize on the real chance to win it all this season. roster solved.