
Julien/By S. Bradley
Everyone’s grasping at reasons for the Bruins’ inconsistency and looking for a scape goat.
If it were up to readers of TheBruinsBlog.net, the man behind the bench would be blamed.
Here’s the result of this morning’s poll:
Who do you blame for the Bruins' inconsistency?
- Claude Julien (58%, 175 Votes)
- Players (38%, 115 Votes)
- Peter Chiarelli (4%, 13 Votes)
Total Voters: 302
Today on his weekly interview with the Felger and Mazz show on 98.5 The Sports Hub, Bruins President Cam Neely tried to not sound like he was anywhere but behind head coach Claude Julien. However, after talking about the team’s mindset and inability to get off to better starts in games, Neely was asked point-blank: is Julien’s job is safe.
“Yeah,” he replied, “but everybody’s accountable. We’ve got expectations we all want to meet from the top on down through the players. We’ve improved the last three years. We’ve had improvement. We feel that we have a better club. We feel like we’ve added more skill, but we’re all ultimately at the end of the day held accountable for how the team performs.”
Obviously, Neely wasn’t going to declare his coach is on the verge of an exit on a radio show. Nonetheless, he didn’t give him a vote of confidence or make a commitment to Julien either. Should things not turn around soon — and that means not just winning, but winning with a few full-game efforts — it would seem Neely, in his role as all-powerful manager of the entire organization, would make someone — or multiple people — accountable. And in pro sports, that usually means taking away someone’s job.









Aaron… I love Boucher. Any guy who turns down his first NHL job offer (with Columbus) shows me he is serious about what he does.
I touched upon it in another article on here. There is this new breed of coach coming up in the NHL. Way more psychologically based and, for the most part, pushing exciting, offensive hockey. The days of the strictly x’s and o’s head coaches I think are dwindling. That’s what assistant coaches are for. Teams now need intelligent leadership who provide more than just telling you where to be on the ice. They see more than just lanes and stats. It’s obvious that stats – especially the defensive ones – aren’t winning us enough games this year. (1st in defense, 3rd best PK, 3rd best road record, 4th in goal differential, 1st in 3rd period differential, etc, etc…)
I’m thinking of guys like Boucher in Tampa, Sacco in Colorado and, of course, Bylsma in Pittsburgh (who took over a team mid-season and led them to the Cup, coincidentally).
The team has chemistry issues.
Good post CNL … look at a guy like Boucher in Tampa, his specialty is sports psychology. Knowing how to motivate and get the most out of his available talent. X’s and O’s are important, but at this level once a system is established and in place, the next most important thing is inspiring your team, being a leader.
Anyone else find it ironic that after the last game Julien spoke about the team needing to be exciting and emotional … I can’t think of anyone who epitomizes those 2 qualities less than Julien.
Keith, Trading your best non-goaltending player will NOT make this a better team. Long term or short term. Think about Matt’s argument about why trading Savard made the team worse.
I agree 100% Rommel. Cats reasoning for not firing him is exactly why he should be fired. They are professionals, but they’re not bosses. Inconsistency in performance directly links to a failure of the coach knowing what buttons to push, when to push those buttons and how hard.
The problem as I see it is that, for the most part, they are doing their jobs out there but that’s it. Strictly business. Yet, we all know that it takes an above and beyond the call of duty attitude to win hockey games at this level. If the players don’t believe in their boss, no matter how professional they are, you’re going to see inconsistencies in performance.
It’s like that in any walk of life. I know what my job is at work. I’m well aware of my position’s outline and the role I play within a system. I can go into work and give 75% and still easily make my mandates, once in a while have a great day, and never risk losing my job… Or I can go into work, give 110%, crush my mandates, and be a crucial cog, consistently contributing to the greater good of the whole.
The difference between those 2 me’s??
Nine times out of ten, it comes down to whether I’m inspired to give that little bit of extra, and that inspiration certainly isn’t coming from me. Why would I waste any extra effort when my 75% is good enough?
Someone has to be there to coax that extra 35% out of me. To push my buttons and light the fire when necessary. Good bosses do it daily. Great bosses make that 110% seem necessary, not optional.
Cobalt … you just made me throw up a little bit. RDS can keep that smug arse thank you very much.
No not enough with blame the Coach. It’s his JOB to have them prepared for every game. If it wasn’t his job to do that they wouldn’t need a coach and the players would just play and win all on their own. In my opinion the players are down, because they are forced to play in a system they no longer believe in. CJ did a great job taking this team and turning it around. But it’s time for a change to a more offensive minded Coach. It doesn’t mean CJ is a horrible person he just can’t take this team to the next evolution. No there’s no guarantee the next coach will be any better, but with Seguin and a possible top 5 or better player in the works for the next draft we might have 2 future star forwards to think about grooming. And again in my opinion I think we need to build the team, and system around Seguin, 2011 top 5 pick, Bergy, Rask, and Lucic instead of forcing your players into a predetermined style of play that may or may not suit their talents.
I think trading chara does more. Maybe they can get the puck moving defenseman everyone always talks about, all the time
….perhaps time for Carbonneau to join Jarvis behind the bench..
cam’s just a figurehead as long as claude remains coach.
Julien should be the defensive coach, not the head motivator. get Neely or Gordon or somebody with some intensity and passion behind that bench. now.
It is the coaches fault. Some things get old and hearing the same guy bark at you to follow a system that hasn’t brought the amount of success expected from this team then its time to change the guy barking. NJ fired him right before the playoffs start what does that tell you about the guy. He turned us around and I will forever remember CJ as being the guy, but they need a new spark, a new approach that better uses the new offensive talent. Also people know what you get from the Claude Julien run team by now, we were so good right away from him coaching is cause we caught everyone by surprise, its time for a new system and to bring back the toughness that defines Boston Bruins hockey.
Enough with “blame the coach”. Yes, I know you can’t fire a whole hockey team, but these guys are professional hockey players and if they just don’t care enough to show up for every shift of every game then it’s because THEY are not doing their job! There are just too many players giving only half of what they are capable of and I don’t think it should be the coach’s job to be their therapist and help them figure out why they aren’t motivated enough to care. Somehow, despite some changes, this is the exact same team as last year. A handful of guys showing up for every game and giving everything they have and a bigger bunch of guys who seem happy to get away with doing just enough to win some games now and then. Maybe, instead of firing the coach, demote the players who think they don’t have to work for their place in the NHL anymore to the AHL and bring up the guys killing themselves to get here. Maybe the Bruins don’t win a Cup that way, but the way I see it they aren’t going to win one anyway this year.
I would be in shock if Jacobs went through another Dave Lewis scenario. I’d like to see what Juien could do with a couple of more wingers whom have speed and don’t wait around for Krejci and Savard to set them up.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Kalman. Matt Kalman said: New blog: Poll result: No question about who readers blame for Bruins' problems http://bit.ly/eefN8P #bruins [...]
I think Julien will see the end of this season through, but if we suffer a poor playoff loss i.e. Carolina or Philly, I see a new coach in our future. He does have a system that works. The problem is that something isn’t working right now AND we need to win in the playoffs.