Amazingly, there was another actual “hockey trade” today in the NHL (as opposed to a salary dump or a swap of a rental player for future considerations).
Dallas shipped power forward James Neal along with defenseman Matt Niskanen to Pittsburgh for defenseman Alex Goligoski. In the 23-year-old Neal, the Penguins get the young top-six forward they’ve been searching for for a while. In Goligoski, the Stars are hoping they’ve found another “puck-moving defenseman” to build around.
This makes two “hockey deals” in four days, with this trade coming on the heels of the Colorado-St. Louis swap that landed Erik Johnson in Denver last week.
A lot of emails and comments came through to The Bruins Blog today asking if the Bruins could’ve snagged Neal, a 6-foot-2, 208-pound physical specimen who has already scored 21 goals in 59 games this season. A lot of people obviously are in my camp and aren’t as confident in the Bruins’ top six’s ability to get the job done come playoff time.
I see two reasons why this couldn’t have happened.
You start with the fact that Bruins general manager Peter Chiarelli is obviously content with his top six as it is. He has already said any trade he makes between now and the Feb. 28 deadline will be “minor.” Adding a piece like Neal would not fall into that classification.
The second part is the more important one, which is the Bruins really don’t have an equivalent to Goligoski. Maybe if Johnny Boychuk were having the type of season the team envisioned for him when they re-signed him last summer, he would be a comparable. But if Boychuk were playing that well, the Bruins wouldn’t want to trade him anyway.
Just like acquiring Johnson, picking up a young veteran like Neal would’ve required Chiarelli to really go out on a limb and tamper with his top six forwards or top four on defense. That’s not in Chiarelli’s blueprint, even to acquire productive youngsters who are under contract beyond this season.
Chiarelli’s main goal was to supplement his club with as little tampering done to the team he built over the summer as possible. He decided to go the rental route with Tomas Kaberle and add to his bottom six up front with Chris Kelly and Rich Peverley. We’ll know by May if his moves were enough.









I appreciate James Neal, but don’t see him as an upgrade over any of our top-6. Not at that price at least. Lucic is having a better year, Horton is definitely not doing what we’d hoped, but still has just as many points (and could heat up anytime), Marchand is my favorite player on the team right now, and I wouldn’t want to separate him and Bergy for anyone, and Recchi has more points and provides something Neal def can’t. Hall of Fame experience.
Having said that, James Neal would be quite a third line acquisition but Pittsburgh paid a huge price to get him. Goligoski’s a dman with nearly the same amount of points as Neal.
In all honesty, when I heard this deal, I more thought of how we couldn’t get Goligoski. Mind you I don’t think Pittsburgh would have moved him to an Eastern team and we weren’t about to give them the forward they need either.
I think it was pretty obvious that chiarelli was really “all in ” on kaberle.. i think his obsession caused us to lose more in that trade then we should of.. having kaberle on his brain def. jaded some other opportunities for younger, better long term players.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Kalman, Jonas Nilsson. Jonas Nilsson said: #Bruins Pittsburgh?s Neal wasn?t really a realistic pick-up for Bruins: Amazingly, there was another actual “hoc… http://bit.ly/hXbRxI [...]
If only there was a team willing to part with something valuable for Ryder’s expiring contract and a pick/prospect package. The Avalanche seem to be open to anything these days, maybe they would consider dealing Hejduk.