On second thought, maybe Bruins’ Marchand didn’t learn his lesson

Marchand/By S. Bradley
Last night after the Bruins’ 3-2 shootout win at Columbus, I noted in my quick game recap that it was pleasing to see Brad Marchand back to his feisty self after his third-period benching last Friday on Long Island.
I hereby retract this statement.
After seeing his hit on R.J. Umberger just once live and once on a quick replay, I didn’t give is a second thought, much like the NESN broadcast of the game I was watching.
Since then I’ve watched the play over and over again, and realized that Marchand really crossed a line by throwing his elbow at Umberger’s head from behind in questionable pursuit of the puck. Here it is one more time:
There’s no doubt there should be at least a one-game suspension for Marchand, who has not committed any prior infractions worthy of a suspension in his NHL career. Tampa Bay defenseman Pavel Kubina had one one-game suspension prior to his elbow on Chicago’s Dean Bolland last week, and Kubina got three games from the NHL. As of 11 a.m., there was no word on any league action in regards to Marchand.
Regardless of how the NHL rules or doesn’t rule, Marchand obviously still has some maturing to do. He lost all his third-period ice time against the Islanders because of the stupid penalties he took in the second period of that game and the third period of the previous night’s contest against Buffalo; and also because of some other overly rambunctious play that has coincided with a lengthy scoring drought (no goals in nine games).
In the aftermath of the benching, Marchand said he knew he had to tone down his act. Well, he obviously has an odd sense of “toned down.”
Luckily for him, the referees completely missed his hit because Rule 48 could’ve come into play and left the Bruins extra shorthanded. Instead, the Bruins got a scoring chance and then seconds later a goal.
Head coach Claude Julien obviously didn’t see the hit either, or he would’ve been less than pleased with his player making contact with the head of another in a situation that was completely avoidable. He might’ve even sliced the forward’s ice time again.
As always, we can only guess at intent because none of us can read Marchand’s mind. But on a play like that, typically a player will reach out for the puck and try to make some shoulder-to-shoulder contact in order to gain inside position. What Marchand did was the equivalent of a chicken wing followed by a half-hearted attempt to reach out for the puck.
Marchand probably couldn’t have picked a worse time to make head contact from behind on an opposing player, considering all the Bruins have been through in the wake of the Zdeno Chara affair and what the entire league has been talking about down in Florida during the GM meetings in terms of heightened awareness and stricter penalties for hits to the head.
Just when I thought Marchand had learned his lesson, he not only put his team at risk for an in-game predicament but made it a possibility that the Bruins could be playing a game or more without one of their leading goal-scorers. With the team in the midst of a scoring drought, outside of its No. 1 line and Zdeno Chara, that’s the last thing the Bruins need.
And even if the league excuses Marchand’s action, Julien might have to address it, again.
I love this guy, he plays in such an intense way…but this time the hit was absolutely STUPID.
GoB’s I think you are right that Marchand’s hit doesn’t look as intentional as it appears-Umberger was leaning in which put his head in a place where heads-especially when you are as short as Marchand normally aren’t.
I think my issue is that I think Marchand could have stopped the hit which tells me Marchand needs to keep his head in the game. His penalty the other night was also based on assuming something (the other guy receiving the puck) that didn’t happen.
But given the fact that the elbow hit the head and the hit was from behind Marchand was definitely in the wrong even if he didn’t intend to hit the head and has bought himself a couple of games in the press box (or should after the hearing).
I don´t agree with pretty much everything here today so I will just not loose my time! See ya on the next post!
He “plays on the edge” and unfortunately crossed the line here. A game or two is probably warranted. He certainly is not in the same class as avery or cooke.
other teams think the Bruins are dirty players and that is not a helpful reputation to have. if the team had suspended Chara for his questionable hit, the referee bias would have been much less of a factor in the last few games. the team has a chance to get this one right and quell the hate a bit.
Bojangles, you’re right Recchi will probably move back up but I was just hoping. But here’s to wishfull thinking!
Rick, c’mon. “Cheap shot hockey”? This is a rookie approaching the 20-goal mark. If you want to make comments like that about a guy like Zenon Knopka, fine, but Marchand is, what, 20 years old? He’s still got some habits to break from his development, but these are the same qualities that helped get him here. A season or two more in Juniors or the AHL could curb that a bit, but no one else in Providence is going to give you the 20-goal season he’s had.
Another way to put it, it sounds like you’d rather watch Paille get knocked off of the puck for an entire season and pot 4-goals. Take your pick, but mark me down for Marchand.
[...] to multiple reports, Marchand will have his hearing about the hit on R.J. Umberger Thursday [...]
Good call Matt. I was ready to vote marchand 7th player but I have really become disenchanted with his lack of discipline and brand of cheap shot hockey. I don’t like players who play the way marchand plays and frankly I look forward to seeing someone pummel him. I would bench him until he can prove that he can play hockey with discipline.
Yep – he needs to get the message. He’s getting out of hand and its been a month in the making. I thought Umberger sold it pretty good at game speed, but after watching the play again, it was just flat out stupid on Marchand’s behalf. I enjoy the fact that this team doesn’t have a Sean Avery or Steve Ott and I’d prefer it if it stayed that way.
Agreed…the rest of the season is going to get ridiculous with the calls I think unfortunately…
I agree with your assessment of what should have been done though, Go B’s. I want to see the Bruins stop this before it becomes a big problem, as this is a horrible time (refs calling the B’s for every little thing they see or imagine) and the fact that it was missed by the refs and is being picked apart by the fan base should give you an idea about how our next game will go…..
He has been good for us, and sitting him certainly means coming out with a sub-optimal squad, but we need him to the line, not decidedly over it as he has done the past few days. True there was no injury nor was it a hard hit, but that’s the stupid sort of thing that can easily be penalized and that’s the true cost of the way he’s playing right now: stupid plays that are all too easily penalized.
Trying to be as unbiased as possible, this is my opinion, for what it’s worth..
There is no denying that Marchands elbow hit Umberger’s head. But to me, it did not seem intentional. It looked as if he was trying to just ‘push’ Umberger out of the way to create some seperation, but since Umberger was bent over, his chicken wing ‘push’ turned into an elbow in the head. He wasn’t looking at him so it’s hard to say that he intentionally lined him up and threw an elbow at his head. I think there should have been a 5 minute elbowing call with a game misconduct – I believe that would have sent the message that even though this wasn’t a hard intentional hit, it still wont be tolerated in the NHL. That being said, I think Marchand needs to learn to play with a little more discipline, he needs to know that an errant elbow through center ice can leave someone seriously injured. Since the intent (in my opinion) wasn’t there, I think an one game suspension at most should be given. If the refs could have caught and called the elbowing/game misconduct, I don’t think any suspension would be necessary.
Ben – I’m dying to watch Peverley and Seguin play together. Of everyone on the Roster, RP may be the best match of speed, and stickery for Seguin. More likely Clode will play it safe and move Recchi back up though.
I hope they don’t sit the kid. For his flaws, he gives it 100% every shift. Not even some of the better players on the team can say that. I like the kid, just needs to clean it up a little. But please don’t stop the yapping, I love that we finally have an agitator to draw some penalties. He just needs to stop getting them.
Sit Marchand and plug in Seguin on that line.
They made a point by benching Ryder. Now make a point by benching Marchand.
To Marchand’s credit there was no follow through with the elbow nor did it look like intent with Umberger being bent over. If both players both were standing up straight Brad obviously because of his height could not hit Umberger in the head.
Having said all that the league is trying to send a message and the elbow did hit the head Brad should get a suspension. Marchand still has some QMJHL edge to him that needs a little cleaning up.
If Marchand gets suspended I can’t wait to see if Heatley gets the death penalty.
It wasn’t a hard hit. Surely the strength of a hit bears relevance on the punishment?? It was dirty, to be sure, but it seemed like Marchy barely applied any force / momentum.
We SHOULD play the Nashville game with him in the pressbox, regardless of what the league says. It was reckless, undisciplined, and could have really hurt someone. Send him a message that’s unacceptable. Let him cool his jets before he becomes a distraction to his teammates.
You got it right Matt. He should be suspended. My guess is 2 games. It makes no difference that Umberger played the rest of the game.
I missed this play during the game too.