BOSTON — Michael Ryder’s last-gasp attempt to avoid a goal-less month of March came fractions of an inch shy tonight.
The veteran Bruins winger, back in the lineup after two games out as a healthy scratch because of Shawn Thornton’s head injury, fired a puck past Toronto goaltender James Reimer and off the post early in the second period.
Boston could’ve used the goal to avoid its 4-3 shootout loss at TD Garden, and Ryder needed it to prevent a 12-game goal-scoring drought. But it wasn’t meant to be.
Nonetheless, Ryder — who fired one shot on goal and three that were blocked on the night — said after the loss that he felt he played the best he could after sitting out a couple contests.
“I didn’t get a whole bunch of ice time,” said Ryder, who logged 12:21 over 13 shifts mostly on the fourth line with Gregory Campbell and Daniel Paille. “But I think I took advantage of what I got. I think I worked hard and had some chances and worked hard and created things. When you’re ice time’s limited, you’ve got to try to do that as much as you can.”
Ryder had another chance to hit the score sheet in the shootout. But like like Tyler Seguin before him and Rich Peverley after him, he fired a wrist shot high to the glove side. In fact Ryder’s shot looked like it was closer to going over the protective netting than into the goal’s net.
“If I hit the net, it was a goal. But I don’t know what happened,” he said. “I think it went so high; I don’t know what happened. But [Reimer] likes to go down and we tried to beat him with a quick shot. Me and [Seguin] both missed the net. If me and [Seguin] hit the net, it’s a goal.”
Instead the Bruins lost the shootout, 1-0. Whether head coach Claude Julien will take into account Ryder’s better effort over his lack of production the next time he has 13 forwards available and has to make out a lineup sheet, remains to be seen.
“Well he didn’t play much in the first period because of everything that was going on. But when he was in there he had some chances. He hit the post and reacted well,” said Julien.
Either because of a desire to add some scoring punch or due to injury, the Bruins are going to need Ryder at some point if their playoff run goes as long as they want it to. Hitting the post might’ve been an indication of him starting to find his game, so it might be worth throwing Ryder out there a few more times before the end of the regular season.










I don’t want to see Ryder back for any price.
Kelley is starting to develop chemistry on the 3rd line and if we let him keep working at it, we could see him start to put up quite a few assists.
Ryder reminds me a lot of the selfish player on almost any team. They get so focused on being the one to score that they don’t see anyone else on the ice/field/court.
I think Ryder can be an asset when he is scoring, but he is too streaky and too irresponsible in other areas to even remotely justify his salary. Some other team can have him-I would rather see the Bruins pull up one of the younger talents from Providence than keep Ryder around after the season and play offs end.
I don’t know what else to say about Ryder’s play last night besides the fact that it’s consistent. He’s been consistently poor in the defensive zone, rarely passes the puck when others have better shot opportunities, tries to skate through 4 people, turns the puck over frequently, overpaid, never takes responsibility for his poor play, etc, etc, etc. I know, he scored some goals his first season, but let’s face it: HE SUCKS! If the Bruins re-sign him I’m going to sell all my season tickets.
I think Kelly’s defensive play helps Peverly and Seguin better utilize their speed. He isn’t a goal scorer, but I don’t think that is why they traded for him (still not convinced he is worth a second round pick, but I don’t think he is a bad player).
Personally I think Paille has worked his tail off in the last several games. Ryder’s scoring chance wouldn’t have come had it not been for Paille’s fight for the puck along the boards.
I think Paille and Seguin have played their way into spots on the roster and Ryder has consistently been playing himself out of a spot.
If Kelly had some luck and wasn’t so tight around the net he’d have a couple goals. I really like the speed that line brings.
Ryder plays if two things happen.
he scores instead of ringing the post, and he scores in the shootout instead of wasting a shot high.
Too bad… try again.
I’m starting to see why Claude keeps Kelly at 3rd line center. Guy is solid as a rock when it comes to the backcheck AND the forecheck, and he wins more battles than I think he gets credit for. That line could be dangerous in the playoffs.
That being said, Ryder doesn’t deserve to come anywhere near this lineup, let alone participate in the shootout. Lack of heart, lack of stones, so much talent wasted because he doesn’t use his brain and has zero motivation.
He didn’t whiff on a puck that hits Kabby’s skate. He didn’t put one on Lupuls tape for their only real goal of the game. That was someone else.
Put him back in the press box. Thanks for “trying”. If he can’t score, i’d rather have Paille in the line up. Both don’t do much, if any, scoring, but one guy hustles on every shift, is fast, and can back-check. Not to mention is excellent on the PK. That guy isn’t Ryder.
Ryder hit a post. Wow. His shootout attempt is a joke he skates right at the goalie and either hits him in the chest or hits the back boards.
I love how he starts his answer with mentioning is playing time, and proceeds to say if the puck went in the net it would be a goal. Sorry Ryder (and Seguin) to me there is no excuse for missing the entire net on a shoot out chance. During the game OK, but penalty shot or shootout there is no reason for a professional hockey player to miss the net completely. What made me even more mad was Ryder and Peverly went for the same shot Seguin did after seeing Marchand score on a deke earlier.
Hopefully that is the last time I ever see Ryder in uniform for the Bs
I don’t think it is that difficult.
I think Thornton isn’t the best hockey player on the ice, but for the fourth line he is perfect and I think he brings veteran leadership to the team that Ryder doesn’t.
Ryder still fails to impress me. He can supposedly shoot, but he just can’t seem to score and he can’t seem to play much hockey when he isn’t shooting.
I think the only way they get Ryder into the line up is to move Kelly to the fourth line (I do think he would play well there) and put Ryder on the third with Peverly and Seguin.
But then I think Paille has been playing well for what Paille is there to do-the guy was really fighting hard in a couple of really good shifts and you can’t fault his penalty kill. He fits on that line.
The Boston Bruins are a team filled with 4th and 3rd line guys and right now Ryder seems to be the odd man out.
Ryder tries to make Bruins’ lineup decision more difficult
And fails
ryder couldn’t finish half a sandwich. that goes for both the 3rd and 4th lines.