Normally today’s the day I fill out my NHL Awards ballot and submit it to Ernst & Young to be counted among the ballots of other voting members of the Professional Hockey Writers’ Association.
Unfortunately, this season I will not be voting. Some of you might’ve already read about the boycott many of us are taking part in to protest the New York Islanders’ treatment of banished blogger Chris Botta.
While I do not know Chris personally, my status as an independent blogger just like him compels me to join with the PHWA chapters that cover New York, New Jersey, Long Island and other teams — including writers from the Boston Herald – in withholding my vote.
Now instead of boring you with more details of boycotts and access restrictions, I’m just going to give you my year-end award winners. I’ll give you winners for four of the individual awards I would’ve voted on through the PHWA (I’ll skip the much-hated Lady Byng) and also winners for the Jack Adams and Vezina Trophy, which are picked by the league’s broadcasters and the league’s general managers, respectively.
Here you go:
Norris Trophy
Zdeno Chara, Boston
I’ll be accused of being a homer with this pick, but season-long favorite Nicklas Lidstrom was a minus for the season for the first time in his career. There’s been a lot of push for Nashville’s Shea Weber of late, and he’s definitely worthy of strong consideration with his 48 points and plus-7 rating. But no defensemen struck a better balance between offense and defense this season than the Bruins’ captain.
Chara was a plus-33 despite matching up against the best of the best offensive players every single night, and he still contributed 44 points. Had the Bruins’ power play been more respectable, there probably would’ve been some more secondary assists to pad his total. As it was, he did his part by scoring eight of his 14 goals on the power play. For the entire season, Chara was the best defenseman in the NHL.
Calder Trophy
Logan Couture, San Jose
To me, this is just a two-player race between Couture and Jeff Skinner of Carolina. That San Jose qualified for the postseason and Carolina missed out impacts my decision a little. But more pertinent to this discussion to me is that of Couture’s 32 goals (one more than Skinner), eight were game-winners. Couture’s 56 points were seven less than Skinner, but the Sharks center was plus-18 and won 53.4 percent of his faceoffs.
Selke Trophy
Manny Maholtra, Vancouver
To me, this was a toss-up between Maholtra and his Vancouver teammate Ryan Kesler. With 73 points, a plus-24 rating and 57.4-percent success rate on faceoffs, Kesler — a former Selke nominee — is the sexier pick.
Maholtra took more than 200 fewer draws than Kesler, but was more proficient (61.7 percent). He led the team that finished third in penalty-kill success in shorthanded ice time (just ahead of Kesler among forwards) and was second to Kesler among forwards in blocked shots. Had he not missed 10 games, Maholtra probably would’ve led the team in that department. More important, those in the know that I’ve talked to and stories I read by people that see a lot more Canucks games say that although Kesler is still a great two-way player, Maholtra was the one called upon to take the tougher defensive shifts more often. He still managed to be plus-9.
Hart Trophy
Daniel Sedin, Vancouver
Anaheim’s Corey Perry made a valiant run to 50 goals that got the Ducks in the playoffs and put his name right up there with Sedin for MVP. However, I don’t want to punish Sedin just because he was consistent all season and his team dominated well enough to wrap up the Presidents’ Trophy with a week to go in the season.
Many will get caught up in the drama of Perry and the Ducks’ plight, but for me the Art Ross Trophy winner with 104 points (the only 100-point scorer in the league) was the best player all year on the best team and he should be rewarded. He was also plus-30 on the season and scored just one game-winning goal less than Perry’s 11.
Now for the ones the PHWA does not vote on:
Jack Adams Award
Alain Vigneault, Vancouver
I’m going to be accused of turning The Bruins Blog into The Canucks Blog. Sure, this award usually goes to the coach that turns a team around after a bad season the year before or leads an injury-sacked team higher in the standings than it should go. For doing a lot despite injuries, Pittsburgh’s Dan Bylsma is a popular pick. But consider that the Canucks won the Presidents’ Trophy with a back line that hardly ever had all six of its expected players in uniform. In fact, the Canucks’ defense corps is still pretty beat up. Then you figure in time missed by Alex Burrows and Maholtra up front, and Vigneault obviously had to work some magic to get lesser players to serve as a productive supporting cast in front of the league MVP and one of the league’s best goaltenders.
Vezina Trophy
Tim Thomas, Boston
No one can accuse me of homer-ism with this pick. Thomas led the league in goals-against average (2.00) and also won the save percentage title with a single-season record of .938. He also picked up nine shutouts and was the most dominant puck-stopper in the league from start to finish for a team that finished third in its conference.
Pekka Rinne of Nashville, Carey Price of Montreal, Roberto Luongo in Vancouver and Henrik Lundqvist with the New York Rangers also had great seasons and would have made this vote tighter had Thomas not produced a super-human effort this season.










I expect the almighty PHWA to be in court soon. Wouldn’t a multi-million law suit against a professional sports league bring attention to a grevious injustice. Just a thought. Punishing undeserving athletes that they report on seems almost petty. Your awesome and I’d love to have a coffee with you. I think if I had more time I might be able to turn you a bit. Think of the guys you cover and the job you love. Respectfully yours DC.
Nifty-
He’s a dues paying member of the PHWA and it is a right of the PHWA to be able do their job at every NHL rink as per agreement between the NHL 7 PHWA. Islanders are allegedly in the NHL.
MK
Somehow I don’t think it would happen to Stan Fishler or Red Fisher or Dick Beddoes.(obscure to most) I have seen writers and even announcers banned or fired. Not a whimper was heard. Botta can write all he wants. He just has to buy a ticket like everyone else. It’s their house. If you don’t like a restaurant critic then don’t let him in the door. It’s your right. This is about exclusion not freedom of the press. It’s a privilege to be granted access not a god given right. If this was about rights then where are the sharks and their subpeonas.
I doubt there’d be even a ripple of outrage, let alone a march, Nifty.
But again, this isn’t about Botta. It’s about the team banning a writer, who hasn’t violated any rules (or at least they won’t give the reason). There’s no due process here. It could’ve been anybody.
MK
One more thing. If you can believe things you read on the net .Botta doesn’t have a lot of support amongst Isles fans. Sounds like he’s the Anti-Kalman. Now if it was Matt K we’ d be marching on Washington.
Thanks Matt. I get your point and I respect it whole heartedly. Media and attention is a bit of an oxymoron. It amazes me that making players suffer votes to beleager a point is the best option that’s all. Like I said it’s a non-story in the rest of the world. Getting the public’s support for the media is a lost cause and I’m sure you can appreciate that. I’m in complete agreement with your stance just not the method. A former employee and someone who may have an axe to grind might not be the best martyr.
Nifty-
Long story short, the Islanders never gave a reason for their ban. If teams can just ban writers because they don’t like what they wrote or for no reason at all, I cannot operate. So a boycott is worth it if that’s what it take to get some attention on this topic and let the league know we won’t stand for it. The league’s response has been disappointing. There might’ve been other ways to protest, but I wasn’t part of that decision making. The other boycotters are mostly print, so it’s not really about a divide between types of media.
MK
Matt. I’ve got some questions over Botta-gate. The writers voted to deny the boycott proposal. I’m sure there are other dynamics at work here. Bloggers vs Beat writers/Columnists and other competitors. Botta was on the fan 590 in T.O but his phone kept cutting off and I don’t know if they got him back later or not. This is a can of worms no doubt. I wish you would reconsider your decision. Will your decision to boycott affect the outcome? If so do you think that a stand with the minority of your peers is worth that? How did the vote go down and was it mostly internet scribes that wanted a boycott? Like I said this story is deeper than I could dive. I tried to get all angles but that would take forever. It’s easy to get the media angle from the media though. The people’s angle is less favourable towards any media and they could care less about this. So from the peoples angle I wish you would reconsider. Who will benefit from your boycott? I’m glad I didn’t train all my life to be ready for the 80 olympics. That and any other boycott over principle or right and wrong has never worked. Now if there was money involved. Now your talking.
Not that I know of, Coach.
MK
Globe not participating in the boycott?
New Jersey is not a city.
The one thing Thomas has against him for the Vezina is game played. 57 is not a lot of starts for a starting goaltender, same goes for Luongo. This is especially concerning when he will be put against possibles Price, Rinne or Lundqvist. I think he will win, but I can also see why he might not.
I do not know why Patrice Bergeron has not been nominated for a Selke yet. The only reason Mike Babcock added Bergeron on to Team Canada was because of his Selke-like abilities. Not putting him on the list last year was so disappointing, and if the same happens again this year, I will be just as disappointed.
Chara, Weber and Lidstrom is a lock as far as I am concerned. Too bad Byfuglien could finish off a great season start. I want Zdeno to win for sure, but it is nice that he will probably be in the company of these two great players, and not the forward that plays defense that we all know as Mike Green.
Claude had a good year this year, but there are other coaches in this league that deserve a nomination more than him. All things considered, it was a pretty smooth year for Boston’s coaching staff and they didn’t have to deal with much adversity. I agree with Alan Vigneault being nominated, but what about Danny Bylsma. With Staal out and Fleury not playing well for the first half and Crosby and Malkin being out for the second half, 106 points is pretty darn good. Crosby might know how to score points at a ridiculous speed, but this coach knows how to win hockey games. Also, until Nashville becomes better on paper and people learn why they win as much as they do, the credit must always go to Barry Trotz. One day he will win it, you’ll see.
An MVP is a player that you need to succeed. Teams like Vancouver, Boston, Detroit and Philadelphia are too deep to have one shining factor that changed the outcome of the season. That is why I am putting the spotlight on Henrik Lundqvist. I believe that he was the NHL’s most valuable player to his team. Price could also be mentioned in arguments, and I have already heard rumours of Thomas getting a nomination here too.
Skinner and Couture has been a great race. I want Skinner to win because I feel that he had more of an overall impact on the team, but I think they will give it to Couture.
It will be interesting to see what the experts come up with this year.
Nice piece MK. Boycotts do matter. Solidarity.
Exhibit 1,506 on why the “Worldwide Leader” shouldn’t bother covering hockey.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/6515/burnside-and-lebrun-our-2010-11-award-winners
Rinne over Timmy who just had one of the greatest years EVER??!! Because he played less games? Bogus
At least our Beloved Bergy gets a little love for Selke!
Marchand could have gotten an honorable mention
Grabner got started kind of late and played on a team that had nothing to lose for most of the second half. More chances = more goals.
MK
Not a bad waiver pick up.
No love for Grabner? Not even a mention. The guy simply terrifies me every time he’s on the ice.
Boycotts are like hope. No one has proved either of them work. I guess it will be like a real democracy when not everyone votes. I know. Principle.
I think the +/- stat is a weak one in the sense that it doesn’t really say everything there is about a defenseman and some times a guy gets unlucky in when he hits the ice, but it is a general guide for overall play. I think though you have to see Chara play to appreciate just how good he can be at shutting down and frustrating the offense. I think he could easily be the Norris winner but doubt that would happen-for one thing when you see the talking head discussions about who should win it very few talking heads bring up Chara as being in the top three much less the winner.
I think even worse is that the Boston fans seem to underappreciate what Chara does.
Matt, strong arguments for all your picks. As I posted before I think Lidstrom gets the Norris as a lifetime achievement award. Although I agree Chara or Weber deserve it more, I have read the 4 letter network’s awards and they give the Norris to Lidstrom. Incredibly they say his +/- is due to the wings defensive struggles (doesn’t he play defense?). Another guy says the stat doesn’t even matter and don’t pay attention to it (???????).