LAKE PLACID, N.Y. – It was tinkering time for the Bruins’ power play again.
In what has become a regular occurrence every two or three weeks, Boston head coach Claude Julien moved some pieces around and switched some pieces on and off the two units during practice today at the USA Rink at the Whiteface Lake Placid Olympic Center in an effort to finally find the right combination.
There’s really not much else Julien and power-play specialist Geoff Ward can do at this point. The Bruins’ power play, which ranked 20th in the regular season, has continued to struggle against Montreal through the first three games of the club’s Eastern Conference quarterfinal series, which Boston trailed two games to one.
Eleven man-advantage opportunities have come and gone for Boston without a goal. Today, the Bruins put their power-play yo-yo back in action by moving Patrice Bergeron from the point to a forward position on a unit with Milan Lucic and David Krejci. Typically when the Bruins want to shake things up, Bergeron moving from one spot to another is the first maneuver made.
The point men in that group were Zdeno Chara and Tomas Kaberle.
The other quintet consisted of Andrew Ference and Dennis Seidenberg on the points with Mark Recchi and Rich Peverley constants at forward, and Michael Ryder and Brad Marchand rotating in and out of the third spot. Nathan Horton was limited to spectator status.
“I think if we don’t do anything, we’re not trying to improve it,” said Julien when asked about the torture that is deciding when to alter the lineups and when to leave them alone. “If we’re changing things around a little bit, you’re trying to improve it and we’ve been trying to do that all year. For the most part, you think you’ve got the players for it. On the other end, you need to execute and they need to use their creativity and the biggest thing is they’ve got to be moving here.
“A lot of times, we’re too predictable. We don’t move enough. We keep telling them. I don’t know if it’s the pressure of the power play not working all year long and it creeps in. No matter what it is, you’ve got to find the solution.”
The solution for the Bruins so far has been to keep Montreal’s power play off the scoreboard while their own man-advantage continues to sputter. The Canadiens are just 1-for-12 in the series. That’s been something of a theme in other playoff series, as Julien pointed out: “PKs tend to be trumping the power plays.”
In fact, in the Tampa Bay-Pittsburgh series, the Lightning are clicking at a 36.4-percent success rate and the Penguins are 0-for-15. Yet the Pens lead that series, 2-1. Phoenix has cashed in on 31.2 percent of its power plays, but still trails Detroit – and its 25-percent power play – 0-3 heading into tonight.
Maybe we’re all overvaluing the power play in this series. However, if the Bruins could somehow be the team to break through first with a man-advantage goal or two, it could tip this series in their favor.
That’s why Julien’s not just going to give up making alterations or running his players through the practice paces until the season ends or there’s an offensive eruption.
With Bergeron and Krejci now up front together, Boston will have two of its best playmakers working the half wall and the goal line, respectively, with the big bull Lucic parked in front. Ference has shown a better knack for getting pucks through from the point of late. If Ryder’s ever going to contribute to Boston’s cause, the power play might be the area he’ll do it in.
And then there’s the chance that the mentality Julien and his staff has been trying to instill in the players might finally click in a game situation.
“I think it’s a lot of everything. We’ve just got to move the puck a little better. We can’t be so predictable,” he said. “I say that all the time. If we’re standing around, we’re easy to defend against. Our guys have to be moving a little bit more and create a little bit more of insecurity for the PK, and right now we haven’t been able to do that enough.”
With a win in Game 3, the Bruins have bought themselves some time to iron things out. But this isn’t about the coaching staff coming up with some grander plan to get the players to what they’ve been instructed. The players themselves, are going to have to execute, finally.
Because if this current alignment doesn’t come through, and the Bruins last long enough in these playoffs, there’ll be another lineup shuffle down the road.










The physicality should be about even. You guys got pretty big heads after the beat-down in beantown because Campbell beat up Pyatt, Boychuk pummeled Spacek and Thornton beat Hamrlik.
Seriously though, look at those matchups… Hamrlik and Spacek never fight. Spacek has had 3 in his career and they were all like the one you saw. Hamrlik can hit but never fights and Pyatt is just a little speedster.
When the matchups make more sense, you have a more even look on physicality.
Obviously, nobody can touch Chara or Lucic. These guys are animals to us but Moen, White, Lupul, Mara, even Pouliot actually are decent fighters.
Combine that with some powerful hitting from Kostitsyn (comeon who in the league can actually get through to Chara except for this guy occasionally), Gill, even Weber, the habs aren’t that weak. In that 8-6 match though, those were nightmare matchups for the Canadiens. It would be like Krejci against …anyone!
So yeah, Gionta, Camaleri, Deharnais are really small guys, aside from that, the Canadiens are not that tiny.
They might be short but the team average weight is higher for the Habs than the bruins…(203 to 201) based on their roster weights…
I cant beleive price gave u these 2-3goal…-.-
The best player/team should make the difference 2night
Good luck guyss
Pouliot wouldnt play becuz he suck,have no balance and not becuz he miss the guy on that hit that cost a penalty…
Molson didnt do that bad when compare to Lemieux thats said the same thing whit cooke on his line up and Boston organisation when savard got hit
PP is not ur fault we are just to good at it how u think we beat PIT/WAS when they did 40-50shot
This is far too nice. Where are all the “you suck” and “no you do!” quotes?
I’m going back to the trolls board.
RD,
I agree with you and with the Montreal media; NYR-WSH were in a similar position last night, and the end of that game could now mean the end of the Rangers’ season. Yet had the Rangers pulled it out, I would be singing a very different tune.
I’m excited for tonight because the energy should be at a maximum- these sorts of scenarios are what make playoff hockey the best experience in professional sports. What scares me as a Bruins fan is is Montreal’s speed and ability to execute, and how well they ride bursts of momentum. The teams have been about even in the physicality department too, a so-called “advantage” of the B’s. So this game is going to come down to puck possession and capitalization, and I think they all know what it means for the series… I’ll be having multiple heart attacks for the duration of the event.
I sure hope when they practice the PP, they start from their own zone. The issue this series hasn’t been lack of movement , it’s the fact that they can’t even get possession in the O zone.
The dump-ins aren’t resulting in won battles and puck possession. The carry-ins have been broken up.
GR90,
The press in Montreal are calling this a do or die game for both clubs. We get you 3-1, it’s all but over (you guys should know from last year that it’s never really over until you get the 4th win).
On the other hand, if you guys square up after the habs had you down 2-0 at home…the anguish at squandering this would be tough to overcome.
They wont say it publicly but it had to piss them off. Pierre Gauthier and even the owner Jeff Molson went public with the opinion that any contact to the head should be banned.
So Pouliot pulls this stunt and makes them look like idiots. To boot, Boston scored 3 seconds after the Pouliot penalty expired. Sorry kid, but we don’t need to see you getting knocked off the puck all the time and then take stupid penalties.
*Pouliot
RD-
Have to hand it to the Habs organization for handling the Puliot thing the right way. Kudos to them.
I like the idea of having Bergie and Krejci down low. They both come off the half-wall with decent confidence, and if there are any cutting/backdoor plays that Ward implemented with this new lineup, as well as some player rotation, I think we’ll see a (hopefully effective) rebirth of the PP tonight. Tonight, more than anything, is a huge momentum game.
Puck movement isn’t the problem – its Player movement.
Players need to move in an out of the box to stretch it and open seams.
I like the idea of moving TK down on the wall more than moving Chara to the front of the net.
The other problem is that the forwards on the PP skate like their fitted with Bauer Elite Cement skates. No movement and certainly no traffic in front of the net…
How about Chara trying the “slap pass”? Set up the one timer from Kaberle and when Chara winds up the slab pass have a forward crash or even park himself at the far post. Even if the puck bounces off of the forward and into the net it counts the same as a pretty goal. Considering how hard Chara’s shot is that lane should be open.
MORE ONE TIMERS!
The goal on the PP is not puck movement, it’s puck movement to open up a good shot opportunity. I sure hope CJ is explaining that to the team, he never says that to the press. He seems to be focused on the movement only.
I am not that over worried about the back check on the power play due to the fact that if Charra is tying up so many Habs which he would it will give Kab the time to set up some great goals. I also believe Charra would draw a lot of penalties in front because short of breaking your composite stick on a cross check how do you move him believe me z could cause mayhem in front of the net it’s there use it.
Julien just wasn’t a great power play coach. When Carbonneau took over for Julien, he had essentially the same lineup. The powerplay went on to become number one in the league that year. Kinda weird considering Carbonneau was a 3 time selke trophy winner.
Unrelated: Pouliot is the healthy scratch for tonight.
I’m surprised Matt didn’t pick up on it yet since the guy caused such a stir last game.
I was saying his hit wasn’t consistent with Montreal’s style of play since it hurt the team and because Montreal is vehemently opposed to headshots.
Teery- Great idea. Didn’t Ottawa use Chara that way. Using his big frame to screen the goalie and that long reach to grab rebounds. I seem to recall one game against the Bs that he had two PP goals that way.
The Sens used to put Z in front of the net and it worked pretty well. However against a team with Montreal’s speed I think the Bruins would be in serious trouble on transition plays. The minute a turn-over happens the 5 on 4 advantage goes out the window if your fifth guy chasing the play is 6’9″, 260lbs. He is a great defenseman but not much of a threat in pursuit. I am not dismissing the idea, God knows they have to try something, I just think the other 4 guys are going to have to be very conscientious about back checking in transition. I would be curious to see who else they would put on the ice in that scenario. Bergeron back on the point for starters I guess. With Sides maybe? Or Boychuck for the slapper? But he has been so suspect defensively so far. Peverly and Krejci up front with Z. Ideas?
Terry,
I love that idea and would like to see the Bruins try it for at least one shift. Chara would certainly attract extra attention that could free up both passing lanes and skating lanes for our quicker players.
NO MORE ONE TIMERS
I think our power play just stands around too much passing the puck around.
Watch some of the teams with good power plays-there is constant movement and rotation. The bruins look like they are glued in place.
Charra in front of the net it will screen Price and swallow 2 Habs to try and move him. Boychuck has a gun from the point. If Charra played between the redline and blue line with his reach they could break in easier and again tie up extra Canadiens opening up the other side of the ice for a Marchand or Peverly to skate in at full speed with no interference.
Chara should just do away with trying his clappers from the point. Granted they are as hard as anyone else’s in the league, the only thing they accomplish is hurting people. His wrister is somewhat underrated and he should give that a couple tries shooting it in there at different angles. Thats just my take on what the Big Man should try differently.
George- They should try that. This is the season that counts.
Ditto Digger that’s the last thing Geoff is but if any two playmakers on the Bruins can get it going it’s Krejci and Bergeron. So if the PP starts to click from here on in I won’t care what Ward does or says.
Even when the PP shows promise, these guys are not finishing. Most of that has to do with their predictable game plan going in, which is to, of course, get the puck back to the D and take a weak-angle one timer. So they can move their feet as much as they want, but if the forwards don’t keep the opposing PK honest with some down low plays and some shots from inside the dots, this PP will continue to go nowhere. They may not have as much offensive talent as we would like, but I do think they have the players to make SOMETHING happen. Its just a matter of not always deferring to that Chara shot (as pretty as it can be at times).
Interesting George.
Just a thought, if this were the regular season I would have tried Kaberle at the wing position on the PP. He’s a great passer and can be a possession guy on the boards. The other reason is that Kaberle would rather pass than shoot almost every time he receives the puck. Let’s face it, the PP sucks and any experimenting they could do to get even 1 goal would be an improvement.
Suprisingly their has been no shorthanded goals for Montreal. Pathetic is what their pp is. They can’t mix things up because they can’t set up.
you beat me to it, digger. no movement and kaberle feeding z for one timers doth not make a pp.
“… and power-play specialist Geoff Ward.”
Really, can one still be condsidered a specialist after failing for 82 games.
Talking about being predictable…how predictable is chara taking a one timer on the PP. I have seen it way too many times this year and it never works. PP is about unpredictability, crisp passes, and quickness…chara is not the right man for the job. The forwards end up feeling pressure to feed him the puck and its the same old same old with no results.