Contrary to popular opinion, the referees did not win tonight’s Game 6 of the Eastern Conference quarterfinal series between the Bruins and Montreal.
By the same token, I can debunk another myth – as far as the first six games of this series are concerned, the Bruins do not have a No. 1 line.
Sure there were some iffy calls against Boston, but a lot of the Bruins’ penalties were of their own doing. There was no denying Boston’s too-many-men violation or the subsequent slash by Dennis Seidenberg that led to Michael Cammalleri’s 5-on-3 goal.
While you can debate the severity of Milan Lucic’s boarding call, it’s a boarding call either way. And Patrice Bergeron followed that up by shooting the puck into the stands. The Canadiens took advantage again with a goal by Brian Gionta.
Those two goals were all the Habs needed for a 2-1 win, which forced Game 7 Wednesday night at the TD Garden.
If the Bruins want their season to reach May, they better not take a woe-is-me attitude and wallow in the tape of those calls, plus the slash on Nathan Horton and goaltender interference on Bergeron – which were suspiciously soft whistles against the road team at the Bell Centre.
When it comes down to it, the Bruins were done in by a couple things we’ve been writing, talking and thinking about since Day 1 of the 2010-11 season – an inability to finish at even strength and a power play that makes the Bruins’ penalty kill look like its best offensive weapon.
No one, not even the Bruins themselves, deny the power play is a disaster. It’s not even worth dissecting it anymore. If they’re not going to win battles and Tomas Kaberle’s never going to shoot, Boston might as well just use the two minutes to rest.
That leaves Boston to try to score 5-on-5, where they played pretty well all season. They finished with a top-1o offensive in terms of goals for per game. Stats, however, can sometimes mislead. And we all know that against some of the league’s better defenses, Boston struggled to finish and their goals average was skewed upward by a few massive outbursts against weaker teams.
Through six games against the Habs, Boston has gotten timely even-strength scoring mostly from the second and third lines. Only Nathan Horton’s double-overtime game-winner from Game 5 can be credited to the first line, as his other goal came off an assist from Patrice Bergeron during a line change and Krejci’s lone goal crossed the goal line with Bergeron and Brad Marchand on the ice.
At even strength or a man-up, the Bruins need their so-called “HuLK Line” to produce and instead have gotten bunk from their top trio. And all three are equally to blame, and they’re running out of time to get the job done.
To be fair, Lucic’s night was limited to just a little more than seven minutes of ice time because he was unfortunately but correctly ejected for a boarding call on Jaroslav Spacek. But that shouldn’t excuse him for not managing a shot on net, or for Horton also failing to fire anything on Carey Price. Krejci had a late scoring chance that Price denied, but early in the game his “slow-motion” approach to rushing the puck turned a perfect opportunity to get a shot on or work a give-and-go with Horton into a giveaway.
Most of the night, Krejci looked equally lost and Horton had the look of a guy who thought this series was best-of-five. You can forgive him for that considering this is his first NHL playoffs in his seven-year career.
However, you can’t forgive the Bruins’ “Big Three” for their no-show in this series. They’ve combined for four points and a minus-4 rating. Krejci has put just nine shots on Price. What looked like a chance for him to solidify himself as NHL No. 1 center has turned into the concrete revelation that he’s no better than a No. 2.
Some credit has to go to the defense pair of P.K. Subban and Hal Gill, who’ve leaned on Boston’s top line all series and made life difficult for them. That still doesn’t mean Krejci and his linemates shouldn’t at least be playing the Habs’ top pair to a stalemate or at least pop in some offense on the power play.
Game 7 is usually a bull ring where only the strong survive. So Milan Lucic (barring a suspension), David Krejci and Nathan Horton have a chance to make the first six games a distant memory, smother the Habs and slay Boston’s most-hated rival. Or they can continue let the horn of the bull go through their hearts and take an extra-long summer’s worth of down time to recover.










[...] do the Bruins advance to the Round 2 to face last postseason’s tormentors from Philadelphia? Matt Kalman writes on The Bruins Blog that it comes down to two factors: Their moribund power play and their top line of Nathan Horton, David Krecji and Milan Lucic. No [...]
[...] do the Bruins advance to the Round 2 to face last postseason's tormentors from Philadelphia? Matt Kalman writes on The Bruins Blog that it comes down to two factors: Their moribund power play and their top line of Nathan Horton, David Krecji and Milan Lucic. No [...]
The only things “consistent” about Krejci are the headaches I get when he’s on the ice. “Productive” – not “consistent” – is the first word you want to think of when describing your top center. “Consistent” just means he gives you the same production (or here, lack thereof), night after night.
And the one cold streak you reference must be the one that started in October 2009 and continued through last night with brief respites such as the start of the Flyers series last season and the Vancouver-Calgary roadtrip this season. I’ve had high hopes for Krejci based on his 08-09 season when he led the league in +/- (one better than teammate and linemate, Blake Wheeler). Then, he was skating against 2nd and 3rd D pairings and his whole line produced very nicely for a 3rd line (you’ll recall Ryder had a nice season, too, in his first year with the B’s).
I’ll finish with a troubling, but indicting, statistic: Milan Lucic and David Krejci tied for the team-lead in points this season with 62. That puts them at 39th in the league. Not a whole lot of Stanley Cup champs out there without a top 30 (nevermind 10) scorer.
Krejci has not looked himself this series, or Lucic. That being said, these 5 games are by far the worst i have ever seen Krejci look and that is saying something. Besides one cold streak where his linemates werent doing anything, Krejci is the most consistent forward night in night out along with Bergeron.
The only thing that I would be nervous about with trading Krejci is that what if he goes to that other team as their number 2 and develops incredibly he is still young and 60+ points is decent. I think that he’d be better with Ryder(or whoever takes his spot) and Seguin on his wings. That may sound dumb but with Lucic and Horton aren’t exactly fast skaters and with his slow paced game he could do better with faster line mates.
Joe,
I think the Bruins would be thrilled to have Krejci as their second-line center, provided a pre-concussed Savard (or his equal) was their first-line center. The strength down the middle was great two years ago with Savard/Krejci/Bergeron. Krejci’s shown he can fill in at top-line center for a while, but he doesn’t deserve the job permanently.
@ Joe: Agreed, I’ve been seriously disappointed in Krejci. He does everything at half time, there’s no urgency in his game and he’s proving he has no ability to finish or come through when its needed the most. That whole line needs to step it up and he’s the catalyst.
The Bruins have scored 13 goals this series. If anyone wants to point a finger, forget Kaberle. Forget Chara missing game 2. Forget the refs. Forget Lucic. All fingers should be pointing at David Krejci. He has been INVISIBLE this round. His one goal would’ve gone in off a dead squirrel thanks to Bergeron’s (who has been excellent) setup. But the bigger issues are he’s $4M+ against the cap and he’s our #1 center. That’s already setting us up for failure. Everyone wants to point to Kaberle as the guy who was supposed to save the PP, make it more effective/efficient/fluid. Fine, that was a big draw of Kaberle’s game, but any successful PP starts with the forwards, and any successful forward line starts around the center. A lot of this has to do with Krejci’s lack of size and refusal to use his body. I’m starting to think he’s just weak, because he hasn’t won a 1-on-1 in this series that I recall. He is also anemic on the dot and he passes up more shooting opportunities than Gandhi in a Bond role.
I’m not writing this team off yet (in this series the Bruins depth > Montreal’s depth and Montreal’s top line isn’t better than the Bs’ by wide enough margin to offset said depth, so I expect the Bruins to win tonight) and still believe they’ll match up well against Philly, but 25+ teams in the league would be thrilled to have David Krejci as their 2nd center. (His 60-something points would play well there, too.) On the other handful of teams he’d be a VERY good 3rd (Washington, Pittsburgh, TB, Vancouver – notice anything?). Point being: this team has been built, coached and paid (IE how cap-space has been allocated) to be a solid team. And that’s about it. Good defense is cheaper and easier to coach than explosive offense and it’s an excellent way to lock up a playoff spot. But Stanley Cups are won with elite offense. Elite offense comes from elite centers.
If I were writing a book, here’s where the chapter would end and continue in a new chapter about potential offseason targets, but like I said I’m not writing them off yet, so that’ll have to wait. LET’S GO B’S!
I do not want Kaberle back. Not sure if it is the system or if he was just over rated, but he doesn’t seem to fit in and I haven’t seen him do much magic.
I think this series has shown we lack a true top line center (I watch Toews play and want that kind of play making-not the Chicago is going to sell him anytime soon, but we dont’ have anyone who is even half a Toews) and we definitely still lack a talented goal scorer.
Peverly I want to keep.
Kelly I don’t mind keeping-had doubts about whether he was worth a second rounder, but he has come through in the play offs. But he is a pretty good 3rd, 4th line grinder. I think he has been better on Peverly’s wing and Peverly has been better at center. I think it is maybe too late to try it, but I wonder if they shouldn’t give Peverly a whirl between Lucic and Horton to see what happens.
I want Ryder gone at the end of the season. I hate his cap hit and while he has been clutch in the play offs, there has to be somebody cheaper out there with a little more consistency.
There was speculation before the deadline that Krejci would have been part of a package to bring in Brad Richards. That’s one trade that would’ve been worth it if Chia could’ve pulled the trigger instead of making a play for Kaberle. Even if it took Krejci, the TOR first-rounder, and one or two prospects from Arniel, Colborne, Caron, Sauve, etc., Richards >>>>Kaberle. I’ll be laughing when Kaberle re-signs with TOR for a substantially lower salary, just because Boston is rattling him. right now.
and it’s starting…..fire the french coach, the refs…..the diving….
even though I’m a habs fan and I’m happy we won I still just don’t understand how were still alive. Just like I wrote yesterday, I’m not sure if the habs are better then we thought or if the bruins aren’t as good as we thought.
The refs were terrible last night and the league is a joke, I counted 6 or 7 penalties that should have been called on the habs, and maybe 2 or 3 that should have been called on the bruins. The same NHL front office that didn’t suspend Chara for the “hockey play” employs Chris Lee and Steve Kozari.
If you guys don’t want Lucic anymore we’d be glad to take him from you guys….The bruins have horses, but no snipers. Habs got snipers and no horses…..weird series….The habs D is getting exposed down low, no markov, no gorges, no wiz….our luck should run out tonight…
watch Michael Cammalleri after he scored his goal last night, no smile, no fist pump….just business.
27 for 65, god bless america.
I said it after the B’s lost games 1 & 2, I’m still saying it, Sequin should be dressed if for no other reason than the power play. Speaking of powerplay or lack of one I should say, whoever along with Julien is responsible for it should be given a raise (with the toe of Neely’s boot) & then be shown the door.
I like Krejci-but honestly if the B’s had the opportunity to get a real first line center I could see a trade. I honestly like Peverly and out of all the trades think he is worth keeping. Kelly has proven his worth this play offs though-but I like him better on Peverly’s wing than centering the line.
i’d keep horton and move the other 2 stiffs in the off season.
Oh and Boston better find a PP soon-and whoever is coaching the PP needs to be fired immediately and somebody else needs to take that job on. Our PP isn’t looking better, it is looking worse.
I honestly think if Thorton is only going to play 2 to 5 min a game then dressing Seguin might be a good idea. I think recently the best our PP has looked was when he was on it with Marchand. If they want to have an energy line Marchand can pull double duty and do a few shifts with the 4th line.
Uh Paille on Krejci’s wing was atrocious. Paille has found his niche as a 4th liner and he should have stayed there. In Julien’s shoes I would have shifted Campbell to the wing-at least Campbell can take and give passes and he has a pretty decent shot.
I think there were a lot of blown calls in this game and too many ticy tac calls that just sort of kept the team from getting into any kind of flow. The 5 on 3 calls were pretty much have to calls, but I cam curious how Bergeron’s was goaltender interference but it wasn’t on the other end, when Thomas got bowled over and Peverly was high sticked twice and no call.
I hope we have the refs from Saturday’s game-those were good refs and they really got that the refs let ticky tac stuff go and call the big things.
The lines were shortened in game 6 with limited time for the 4′th line and the same will happen for game 7. Why not insert Seguin for some PP time and spot duty. Paille was comical when exposed on the first line.
Larry – Right on. Along with a few more players who look as if they want to be doing something else. The powerless play is pathetic. The coach cannot figure out a line to get a shot off. The only player that exites me everytime he is on the ice is Marchand. If they all would play with his intensity this series would have been won by the Bruins. Stupid penaltys and lack of any power play this late in the year has to come down to piss poor coaching.
Krejci a #1 center? are you kidding me? he’s borderline #2, he’s nifty with the puck at times, like maybe every 4-5 games or so, and thats about it. Look at the goal Jonathan Toews scored for Chicago, with 1:30 left to tie the game up in Vancouver tonight, shorthanded mind you, and tell me David Krecji has ever scored a goal like that. Toews would be a #1 center, Krejci not so much. Krejci might help you win 3 or 4 games a year, that’s not #1 territory by any means. I think win or lose, the B’s should try to shop DK around next year, i think we’ll all be surprised with how little they get in return for him.
I guess I should mention I was refering to DK. The hands reference could fit many B’s.
I thought he had better hands. Roberto Duran has softer hands. He’s had some glorious chances. You can tell when guys are natural scorers. They go high even if they’re not looking. Boston keeps firing into the best set of feet in the league.