Can’t kill Bruins’ momentum when PK is working its magic
The Bruins’ power play is obviously never going to provide the team with any production, so it’s up to the penalty kill to make sure special teams aren’t a total loss in the Eastern Conference Final series with Tampa Bay.
So far Boston’s penalty-killers have held up their side of the bargain.
The Bruins kept the Lightning off the board on four power-play opportunities and limited them to just four man-advantage shots in last night’s Game 5 win to run their penalty-kill success rate to 16-for-17 in the series Boston now leads three games to two.
“I think it kind of actually did the same thing in our favor that it did in their favor last game. We had those two early power plays in the second period [in Game 4] and we didn’t do much. They built momentum off that,” head coach Claude Julien said after the game. “And I know when [Nathan Horton] came out after that second one there [in the second period], he scored a big goal and got us back in the game. So it did build momentum. I think our penalty kill did a great job tonight for us.”
The Bruins killed three straight Tampa Bay power plays from the first period through early in the second period. One of those penalty kills featured four players — Dennis Seidenberg, Adam McQuaid, Rich Peverley and Chris Kelly — staying on the ice in the Bruins’ zone for 1:50 until they finally cleared the puck. You can argue how effective that kill really was, but know that the Lightning managed just one shot on goal in that entire span of the game.
“Yeah it was huge. Our penalty kill has been great especially this game,” said center Patrice Bergeron, another key shorthanded performer. “It’s been one reason why we won tonight, the way that we competed and the way that we played out there even though there’s one penalty kill where Kelly and [Peverley] who stayed on the ice for almost two minutes but still, they didn’t give out much and they found a way to get the puck out.”
Tampa Bay’s power play entered the conference final with the best success rate among teams in the NHL final four.
The best news for the Bruins is that while Tim Thomas definitely has the Lightning shaking their collective head, the penalty kill also has Tampa Bay grasping for answers. Lightning star sniper Steven Stamkos sounded confused after the Bruins’ win.
“Our power play is struggling right now,” said Stamkos. “We had a few chances in the second [period] to kind of get another one and get some breathing room. But, it seemed like they got some momentum off the penalty kill. We started to get away from our game.
“We had probably a four- or five-minute span where it was odd man chances both ways. Kind of a run and gun style and that is not our team. We got away from what worked. In the end, yeah we got a lot of shots on net. We had some chances. But, our power play has to be a lot better, and then we have to stick to our plan for the whole 60 minutes if we want to win.”
Lightning coach Guy Boucher lamented his team’s recent tendency to be too cute with the puck on the power play. That’s usually a sign that team’s a bit psyched out.
While the Bruins still want to stay out of the box, their penalty killers might actually be providing them a boost — especially when they get off to a slow start like they did in the first period of Game 5.
“Yeah I think so. For sure, when you’re killing, you definitely have to move your feet. You can’t be caught standing still,” Kelly said.

[...] that struggles; there’s a group of penalty killers making life miserable for them as well. From The Bruins Blog on Boston’s PK in Game 5: The Bruins killed three straight Tampa Bay power plays from the first period through early in the [...]
[...] that struggles; there's a group of penalty killers making life miserable for them as well. From The Bruins Blog on Boston's PK in Game 5: The Bruins killed three straight Tampa Bay power plays from the first period through early in the [...]
I think we have three very strong PK units-and Paille at times has been a one man PK machine.
Our PP sucks and I am not really sure there will be an answer for it anytime soon. Some of the changes I like. I think they look better in an umbrella and I liked the move to Chara in front of the net, but not sure those changes are going to produce.
Anyone still advocating Paille or Campbell sit instead of Thornton…???
Keep Chara in front of the net on the PP and there will be more goals scored then, compared to when he is at the point putting one timers into peoples ankles.
Kelly more than made up for that botched 2 on 1 with Seguin with his shutdown PK play
paille, kelly, pev… all great pick ups by chia. bergy had the latter two riding with him when they scored the eng.
One way to make up for a horrible PP? Bring the other team’s PP down to your level!
Completely agree about Paille. Another guy who makes the absolute most of his time in the playoffs.
His effort has been tremendous. Plus the guy can fly. That’s a key ingredient for the PK. His contributions have been a big factor on these kills. Four shots. You can’t do any better than that.
They will need to keep that up if they make it to the finals. Van and SJ usually have good PP’s. Kelly and Paille are great role players, some fans don’t understand you need that in hockey just like most other pro sports.
Paille has been a beast on the PK and I don’t think you’ll find anymore Bruins that think PC overpaid for Kelly!